Soft Robotics: State of Art and Outlook

Attila Mészáros; József Sárosi

doi:10.14232/analecta.2022.1.8-13

Authors

Attila Mészáros University of Szeged
József Sárosi University of Szeged https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6303-5011

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14232/analecta.2022.1.8-13

Keywords:

flexible-robots, pneu-net, soft-actuator, bio-inspired robot

Abstract

Widely used robot systems have a rigid base structure that limits the interaction with their environment. Due to the inflexible attachment points, conventional robotic structures can only manipulate objects with their special gripping system. It can be difficult for these systems to grasp objects with different shapes, handle complex surfaces or navigating in a heavily crowded environment. Many of the species observed in nature, like octopuses are able to perform complex sequences of movements using their soft-structured limbs, which are made up entirely of muscle and connective tissue. Researchers have been inspired to design and build robots based on these soft biological systems. Thanks to the soft structure and high degree of freedom, these soft robots can be used for tasks that would be extremely difficult to perform with traditional robot manipulators. This article discusses the capabilities and usability of soft robots, reviews the state of the art, and outlines the challenges in designing, modelling, manufacturing, and controlling.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Trivedi, D., Rahn, C. D., Kier, W. M. & Walker, I. D. (2008): Soft robotics: Biological inspiration, state of the art, and future research. Applied Bionics and Biomechanics 5, 99–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/11762320802557865

Rus, D., and Tolley, M. T. (2015): Design, fabrication and control of soft robots. Nature 521, 467–475. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature14543

Wehner, M. et al. (2014): Pneumatic energy sources for autonomous and wearable soft robotics. Soft Robotics 1, 263–274. https://doi.org/10.1089/soro.2014.0018

Xu, S. et al. (2013): Stretchable batteries with self-similar serpentine interconnects and integrated wireless recharging systems. Nature communications 4, 1543. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2553

Nishioka, Y., Uesu, M., Tsuboi, H., Kawamura, S., Masuda, W., Yasuda, T., et al. (2017): Development of a pneumatic soft actuator with pleated inflatable structures. Adv. Robot. 31, 753–762. https://doi.org/10.1080/01691864.2017.1345323

Robertson, M. A., Sadeghi, H., Florez, J. M., and Paik, J. (2016): Soft pneumatic actuator fascicles for high force and reliability. Soft Robot. 4, 23–32. https://doi.org/10.1089/soro.2016.0029

Chou, C.-P., Hannaford, B. (1996): Measurement and modeling of McKibben pneumatic artificial muscles. Robotics and Automation, IEEE Transactions on 12, 90–102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/70.481753

Onal, C. D., Chen, X., Whitesides, G. M., Rus, D. (2011): Soft mobile robots with on-board chemical pressure generation. In International Symposium on Robotics Research (ISRR), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29363-9_30

Katzschmann, R. K., Marchese, A. D., Rus, D. (2014): Hydraulic Autonomous Soft Robotic Fish for 3D Swimming. In International Symposium on Experimental Robotics (ISER), 1122374. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23778-7_27

Bar-Cohen, Y. (2004): Electroactive Polymer (EAP) Actuators as Artificial Muscles: Reality, Potential, and Challenges (SPIE Press) http://dx.doi.org/10.2514/6.2001-1492

Mazzeo, A. D., and Hardt, D. E. (2013): Centrifugal casting of microfluidic components with PDMS. J. Micro Nano Manufactur. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4023754

Tolley, M. T., Shepherd, R. F., Mosadegh, B., Galloway, K. C., Wehner, M., Karpelson, M., et al. (2014): A resilient, untethered soft robot. Soft Robot. 1, 213–223. https://doi.org/10.1089/soro.2014.0008

Kruth, J.-P. (1991): Material incress manufacturing by rapid prototyping techniques. CIRP Ann. 40, 603–614. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-8506(07)61136-6

Zolfagharian, A. et al. (2016): Evolution of 3D printed soft actuators. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical. 250. 258-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2016.09.028

Laschi, C. et al. (2012): Soft robot arm inspired by the octopus. Advanced Robotics 26, 709–727. https://doi.org/10.1163/156855312X626343

Lin, H.-T., Leisk, G. G., Trimmer, B. (2011): GoQBot: a caterpillar-inspired soft-bodied rolling robot. Bioinspiration & biomimetics 6, 026007. doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-3182/6/2/026007

Mazzolai, B., Margheri, L., Cianchetti, M., Dario, P., Laschi, C. (2012): Soft-robotic arm inspired by the octopus: from artificial requirements to innovative technological solutions. Bioinspiration & biomimetics 7, 025005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-3182/7/2/025005

Marchese, A. D., Onal, C. D., Rus, D. (2014): Autonomous soft robotic fish capable of escape maneuvers using fluidic elastomer actuators. Soft Robotics 1, 75–87. https://doi.org/10.1089/soro.2013.0009

Tolley, M. T. et al. (2014): A resilient, untethered soft robot. Soft Robotics 1, 213–223 https://doi.org/10.1089/soro.2014.0008

Onal, C. D., Rus, D. (2013) Autonomous undulatory serpentine locomotion utilizing body dynamics of a fluidic soft robot. Bioinspiration & biomimetics 8, 026003. doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-3182/8/2/026003

Tolley, M. T. et al. (2014): An untethered jumping soft robot. In Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEE/RSJ International Conference on, 561–566 https://doi.org/10.1089/soro.2014.0008

Stokes, A. A., Shepherd, R. F., Morin, S. A., Ilievski, F., Whitesides, G. M. (2013): A hybrid combining hard and soft robots. Soft Robotics 1, 70–74. https://doi.org/10.1089/soro.2013.0002

Ilievski, F., Mazzeo, A. D., Shepherd, R. F., Chen, X. & Whitesides, G. M. (2011): Soft robotics for chemists. Angewandte Chemie 123, 1930–1935 https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201006464

Brown, E. et al. (2010): Universal robotic gripper based on the jamming of granular material. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107, 18809–18814. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1003250107

Deimel, R., Brock, O. (2014): A novel type of compliant, underactuated robotic hand for dexterous grasping. Robotics: Science and Systems, Berkeley, CA 1687–1692 https://doi.org/10.1177/0278364915592961

Suzumori, K., Iikura, S., Tanaka, H. (1992): Applying a flexible microactuator to robotic mechanisms. Control Systems, IEEE 12, 21–27 doi: 10.1109/37.120448

Park, Y.-L. et al. (2014): Design and control of a bio-inspired soft wearable robotic device for ankle– foot rehabilitation. Bioinspiration & biomimetics 9, 016007 doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-3182/9/1/016007

Polygerinos, P., Wang, Z., Galloway, K. C., Wood, R. J., Walsh, C. J. (2014): Soft robotic glove for combined assistance and at-home rehabilitation. Robotics and Autonomous Systems inpress https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2014.08.014

Mengüç, Y. et al. (2014): Wearable soft sensing suit for human gait measurement. TheInternational Journal of Robotics Research 33,1748-1764 https://doi.org/10.1177/0278364914543793