Factors for Choosing STEM Career in Middle School Aged Girls The Case of North Macedonia
Main Article Content
Abstract
This paper investigates the factors related to pursuing STEM career of middle school-aged girls in the Republic of North Macedonia. The underrepresentation of women in STEM, particularly in developing economies, is significant, therefore understanding early career determinants is crucial. Using the Theory of Planned Behavior as the theoretical framework, the study explores the role of attitudes, perceived behavioral control, and subjective norms in shaping STEM intentions. Results indicate that attitudes towards STEM and maternal employment status significantly influence STEM career intentions. Findings emphasize the need for targeted educational interventions that foster positive STEM perceptions and provide role models. These efforts are essential to stimulate interest in STEM, reduce gender disparity, and contribute to economic growth by developing a skilled female workforce.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Ajzen. I. (1991) The theory of planned behavior.
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 50, 179-211.
Ajzen. I. (2002) Perceived Behavioral Control
Self-Efficacy. Locus of Control and the Theory of Planned Behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 32 (4). 665-683.
Ajzen. I. (2012) Theory of Planned Behavior. in
P.A.M. Lange. A.W. Kruglanski and E.T. Higgins (eds) Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology. 439-459. London: Sage.
Almeda. M.V. and Baker. R. (2020). Predicting
student participation in STEM careers: The role of affect and engagement during middle school. Journal of Educational Data Mining. 12 (2). 33-47.
Audet. J. (2004). A Longitudinal Study of the
Entrepreneurial Intentions of University Students. Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal. 10 (1-2). pp. 3-16.
Beede. D.N.. Julian. T.A.. Langdon. D.. McKittrick. G.. Khan. B. and Doms. M.E.. (2011). Women in STEM: A gender gap to
innovation. Economics and Statistics Administration Issue Brief. number 04-11. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED523766.pdf.
Blotnicky. K.A.. Franz-Odendaal. T.. French. F..
and Joy. P. (2018). A study of the correlation between STEM career knowledge. mathematics self-efficacy. career interests. and career activities on the likelihood of pursuing a STEM career among middle school students. International Journal of STEM Education. 5 (22). Doi: 10.1186/s40594-018-0118-3.
Donmez. I. and Idin. S. (2020). Determination of
the STEM Career Interests of Middle School Students. International Journal of Progressive Education. 16(4). pp. 1-12. doi: 10.29329/ijpe.2020.268.1.
Donovan. B.M.. Moreno Mateos. D.. Osborne.
J.F. and Bisaccio. D.J.. (2014). Revising the economic imperative for US STEM education. PLoS biology. 12(1). p.e1001760.
European Commission (2022). North Macedonia
2022 Report. Available at: https://neighbourhood-enlargement.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2022-10/North%20Macedonia%20Report%202022.pdf.
Hanushek E.A.. Jamison D.T.. Jamison E.A.. Woessmann L. (2008). Education and economic growth: It's not just going to school. but learning something while there that matters. EdNext. 8. 62–70.
Lent. R.W.. Brown. S.D. and Hackett. G. (2002). Social cognitive career theory. In Brown.D. (Ed) Career Choice and Development. vol. 4. pp. 255–311. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Lopez. P.. Simo. P. and Marco. J. (2023). Understanding STEM career choices: A systematic mapping. Helyon. 9. e16676. Doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16676.
Kamsi. N.S.. Firdaus. R.B.R.. Razak. F.D.A. and Siregar. M.R. (2019). Realizing Industry 4.0 Through STEM Education: But Why STEM Is Not Preferred?. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 506 012005. Doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/506/1/012005.
Knezek. G.. Christensen. R.. Tyler-Wood. T.. & Periathiruvadi. S. (2013). Impact of Environmental Power Monitoring Activities on Middle School Student Perceptions of STEM. Science Education International. 24(1). 98-123.
Magnuson. C.S. and Starr. M.F. (2000). How early is too early to begin life career planning? The importance of the elementary school years. Journal of Career Development. 27. 89–101.
Mahmud. M.I.. Kari. D.N.P.M. and Ai. T.Y (2022). The Relationship between Career Interests and STEM Careers of Secondary School Students. Journal of Positive School Psychology. 6 (2). pp. 587-595.
Mau. W.J.. and Li. J. (2018). Factors influencing STEM career aspirations of underrepresented high school students. The Career Development Quarterly. 66. pp. 246-258. Doi: 10.1002/cdq.12146.
McMaster. N.. Carey. M.D.. Martin. D.A. and Martin. J. (2023). Raising primary school boys' and girls' awareness and interest in STEM-related activities. subjects. and careers: An exploratory case study. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research. 12 (1). pp. 1-18. Doi: 10.7821/naer.2023.1.1135y.
Mishkin. H.. Wangrowicz. N.. Dori. D. and Dori. Y.J. (2016). Career choice of undergraduate engineering students. In Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 228: 2nd International Conference on Higher Education Advances. HEAd´16. pp. 222 – 228.
Moore. R. & Burrus. J. (2019). Predicting STEM major and career intentions with the Theory of Planned Behavior. The Career Development Quarterly. 67. 139-155. Doi: 10.1002/cdq.12177.
Moses. P.. Cheah. P.K.. Tey. T.C.Y. and Chiew. J.X. (2020). Development of the
Theory of Planned Behavior Questionnaire: Students’ career choices in STEM. In H-J.. So. M.M.. Rodrigo. J.. Mason and A. Mitrovic (Eds). Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Computers in Education. Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education. pp. 292-302.
Nugent. G.. Barker. B.. Welch. G.. Grandgennett. N.. Wu. C.R. and Nelson. C. (2015). A model of
factors contributing to STEM learning and career orientation. International Journal of Science Education. 37 (7). 1067-1088. DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2015.1017863.
OECD (2022). Education at a Glance: OECD
indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/3197152b-en.
Potvin. P. and Hasni. A. (2014). Interest.
motivation and attitude towards science and technology at K-12 levels: a systematic review of 12 years of educational research. Studies in Science Education. 50 (1). pp. 85-129. Doi: 10.1080/03057267.2014.881626.
Schina. D.. Esteve-González. V.. and Usart. M. (2019). The role of gender in students’
achievement and self-efficacy in STEM. In Pérez-Aldeguer. S.. and Akombo. D. (Eds.). Research. technology and best practices in Education. (pp. 28-38). Eindhoven. NL: Adaya Press.
Shulga. T.. Zaripova. Z.F.. Sakhieva. R.G.. Devyatkin. G.S.. Chauzova. V.A. and Zhdanov. S.P. (2023). Learners’ career choices in STEM
education: A review of empirical studies. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics. Science and Technology Education. 19 (5). em2261. Doi: 10.29333/ejmste/13154.
Siani. A. and Harris. J. (2023). Self-confidence
and STEM career propensity: Lessons from an all-girls secondary school. Open Education Studies. 5. 20220180. Doi: 10.1515/edu-2022-0180
So. W.W.M.. Chen. Y and Chow. S.Ch.F. (2020). Primary school students’ interests in
STEM careers: how conceptions of STEM professionals and gender moderation influence. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. 32. pp. 33-53. Doi: 10.1007/s10798-020-09599-6.
Stoet. G.. and Geary. D.C. (2018). The Gender-
Equality Paradox in Science. Technology. Engineering. and Mathematics Education. Psychological Science. 29 (4). 581-593. Doi: 10.1177/0956797617741719.
Tey. T.C.Y.. Moses. P. and Cheah. P.K. (2020).
Teacher. parental and friend influences on STEM interest and career choice intention. Issues in Educational Research. 30 (4). 1558-1575.
Tomperi. P.; Kvivesen. M.; Manshadi. S.; Uteng. S.; Shestova. Y.; Lyash. O.; Lazareva. I.; Lyash. A. (2022). Investigation of STEM
Subject and Career Aspirations of Lower Secondary School Students in the North Calotte Region of Finland. Norway. and Russia. Education Sciences. 12 (3). 192. Doi: 10.3390/ educsci12030192.
Tyler-Wood. T.. Johnson. K. and Cockerham. D. (2018). Factors influencing student STEM
career choices: Gender differences. Journal of Research in STEM Education. 4 (2). 179-192.
UNESCO (2019). Women in Science Fact
Sheet no 55. http://uis.unesco.org/sites/default/files/documents/fs55-women-in-science-2019-en.pdf.
Webb. T. L.. and Sheeran. P. (2006). Does
changing behavioral intentions engender behavior change? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence. Psychological Bulletin. 132. 249–268.
Wigfield. A.. Eccles. J.S.. Fredericks. J.A.. Simpkins. S.. Roeser. R.W. and Schiefele. U. (2015). Development of achievement
motivation and engagement. In R.M. Lerner. C. Garcia Coll. M.E. Lamb (Eds.). Handbook of Child Psychology and Developmental Science (7th ed.). Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons. Inc. pp. 1-44. Doi: 10.1002/9781118963418.childpsy316.
World Economic Forum (2023). Global
Gender Gap Report 2023. Available at: https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GGGR_2023.pdf?_gl=1*6txrw4*_up*MQ..&gclid=Cj0KCQjwgNanBhDUARIsAAeIcAupe1P_7vNlCaJxmE4dM0cjYmBcMRoD8CmEgjuO_FIgPF56J1wjCv4aAroQEALw_wcB.
Zhou, S.N., Zeng, H., Xu, S.R., Chen, L.Ch and Xiao, H. (2019). Exploring changes in
primary students’ attitudes towards science, technology and mathematics (STEM) across genders and grade levels, Journal of Baltic Science Education, 18 (3), 466-480. Doi: 10.33225/jbse/19.18.466.