Assessing Landscape Sensitivity Based on Fragmentation Caused by the Artificial Barriers in Hungary

Main Article Content

Teodóra Bata
Gábor Mezősi

Abstract

Artificial barriers significantly disturb the landscape unit. Roads split the contiguous landscape units, thus basically modi fying their ecological characters. The more artificial barriers are constructed in the landscape, the more fragmented it is. Theref ore, the contiguous landscape unit is divided into two or more patches, weakening resilience and stability of ecological systems. During decrease in patch size, the stability reduces until the patch size is at its minimum viable or effective population size. In current study analysing the degree of fragmentation caused by artificial barriers in meso-scale landscape units (meso-regions) we can get an overall picture about changes in their stability and sensitivity. The major aims of this study is to investigate the fragmentation of landscape units caused by three types of artificial barriers (roads, railways and settlements) in micro-regions, and to measure the degree of fragmentation and its spatial-temporal (1990, 2011 and future scenario to 2027) changes using mathemat ical/ statistical analysis and landscape metrics (Number of Patches, Division, Landscape Splitting Index and Effective Mesh Size). By calculating landscape fragmentation metrics, the micro-regions are identified, which must be protected with high priority in the future. In the planning processes, type and position of artificial barriers could be more properly determined by calculation of these landscape metrics.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Bata, Teodóra, and Gábor Mezősi. 2013. “Assessing Landscape Sensitivity Based on Fragmentation Caused by the Artificial Barriers in Hungary”. Journal of Environmental Geography 6 (1-2):37-47. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10326-012-0005-1.
Section
Articles

Funding data

References

Barta, K., Szatmári, J. 2010. Antropogén hatások a belvízképződésben. Esettanulmány az M5 autópálya szatymazi szakaszának talajvízáramlásban betöltött szerepéről (Anthropogenic effects in formation of excess water). Hidrológiai Közlöny 90 (2), 23-25. (in Hungarian).

Barta, K., Szatmári, J. Posta, Á. 2011. A belvízképződés és az autópályák kapcsolata (Relationship between excess water inundation and motorways). Földrajzi Közlemények 135 (4), 379-387 (in Hungarian).

Czúcz, B., Molnár, Zs., Horváth, F., Botta-Dukát, Z. 2008. The natural capacity index of Hungary. Acta Botanica Hungarica 50, 161-177.

Csorba, P. 2005. Hazai tájak ökológiai szempontú szerkezetének vizsgálata (Investigation of the ecological structure of Hungarian landscapes. (in Hungarian) http://geography.hu/mfk2006/pdf/Csorba%20P%E9ter.pdf (last available: 2013.02.04.)

Csorba, P. 2007. Tájszerkezet-kutatások és tájmetriai mérések Magyarországon (Landscape structure studies and landscape metric measurements in Hungary). Academic Doctoral Thesis, Debrecen, 131 p. (in Hungarian)

Fi, I., Bocz, P., Pethő, L., Tóth, Cs. 2012. Útburkolatok méretezése (Sizing of road pavements). TERC Kft, 458 p (in Hungarian).

Forman, R.T.T. 1995. Landscape mosaics. Land Mosaics: -The Ecology of Landscapes and Regions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge/New York, 632 p.10.1017/9781107050327

Forman, R.T.T., Alexander, L.E. 1995. Roads and Their Major Ecological Effects. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 29, 207-231.

Forman, R.T.T., Godron, M. 1986. Landscape Ecology. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, NY, USA.

Forman, R.T.T., Sperling, D., Bissonette, J.A., Clevenger, A.P., Cutshall, C.D., Dale, V.H.,- Fahrig, L., France, R., Goldman, C.R., Heanue, K., Jones, J.A., Swanson, F.J., Turrentine, T., Winter, T.C. 2003. Road ecology: science and solutions. Island Press, Washington, D.C., USA, 504 p.

Fu, W., Liu, S., Degloria, SD., Dong, S., Beazley, R. 2010. Characterization the “fragmentation-barrier” effect of road networks on landscape connectivity: A case study in Xishuangbanna, Southwest China. Landscape and Urban Planning 95, 122-129.

Gilpin, M.E., Soulé, M.E. 1986. Minimum viable populations processes of species extinction. In: Soulé, M.E. (ed.) Conservation Biology. The science of scarcity and diversity. Sinauer Assoc. Inc. Sunderland, 19-34.

Girvetz, E.H., Thorne, T.H., Berry, A.M., Jaeger, J.A.G. 2008. Integration of landscape fragmentation analysis into regional planning: A statewide multi-scale case study from California, USA. Landscape and Urban Planning 86, 205-218.

Haines - Young, R., Chopping, M. 1996. Quantifying landscape structure: A review of landscape indices and their aplicatioton to forested landscapes, Progress in PhysicalGeography 20, 418-445.

Hardy, A., Clevenger, A.P., Huijser, M., Neale, G. 2004. An overview of methods and approaches for evaluating the effectiveness of wildlife crossing structures: emphasizing the science in applied science. In: Irwin, C.L., Garrett, P., McDermott, K.P. (ed.) Proceedings of the 2003 International Conference on Ecology and Transportation, Center for Transportation and the Environment, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, 319-330.

Hargis, C.D., Bissonette, J.A., David, J.L. 1998. The behaviour of landscape metrics commonly used in the study of habitat fragmentation. Landscape Ecology 13, 167-18610.1023/A:1007965018633

Harris, L.D. 1984. The Fragmented Forest: Island Biogeography Theory and the Preservation of Biotic Diversity. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 230 p.10.7208/chicago/9780226219950.001.0001

Jaeger, J.A.G. 2000. Landscape division, splitting index, and effective mesh size: New measures of landscape fragmentation. Landscape Ecology 15 (2), 115-130.

Jaeger, J.A.G. 2002. Landscape fragmentation. A transdisciplinary study according to the concept of environmental threat (in German, Landschaftszerschneidung. Eine transdisziplinäre Studie gemäß dem Konzept der Umweltgefährdung). Verlag Eugen Ulmer, Stuttgart, 447 p.

Jaeger, J.A.G., Schwarz-von Raumer, H.G., Esswein, H., Müller, M., Schmidt-Lüttmann, M. 2007. Time series of landscape fragmentation caused by transportation infrastructure and urban development: a case study from Baden- Württemberg (Germany). Ecology and Society 12 (1), 22 p.10.5751/ES-01983-120122

Jongman, R. 1995. Nature conservation planning inEurope: developing ecological networks. Landscape and UrbanPlanning (32), 169-183.

Kerényi, A. 2007. Tájvédelem (Landscape protection). Pedellus Tankönyvkiadó, Debrecen, 184 p (in Hungarian).

Kun, Á., Barta, K., Katona, O. 2012. Az M43-as autópálya által indukált 2010 -11 - es belvíz talajtani hatásai (The effects of inland excess water induced by M43 motorway in 2010-2011). A VI. Magyar Földrajzi Konferencia, a MERIEXWA nyitókonferencia és a Geográfus Doktoranduszok Országos Konferenciájának Tanulmánykötete, Szegedi Tudományegyetem Természeti Földrajzi és Geoinformatikai Tanszék, 483-494 (in Hungarian).

Kevei - Bárány, I. 2010. Gondolatok a Közép-európai tájökológiai kutatásokról (Thoughts from the Central European landscape ecological research). In: Szilassi, P., Henits, L. (ed.) Földrajzi Tanulmányok 5, Tájváltozásértékelési módszerei a XXI. Században, 135-142 (in Hungarian).

Marosi, S., Somogyi, S. (ed.) 1990. Magyarország kistájainak katasztere (The Cadastre of. Hungary's Micro-landscapes I-II). MTA FKI, Budapest, 1023 (in Hungarian).

Mas, J.F., Gao, Y., Pacheco, J.A.N. 2010. Sensitivity of landscape pattern metrics to classification approaches. ForestEcology and Management 259, 1215-1224.

McGarigal, K., Marks, B.J. 1995. FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. U.S.Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, 122 p.10.2737/PNW-GTR-351

Megyeri, J. 1997. Vasútépítéstan (Railway constructions). Műegyetemi Kiadó, Budapest, 296 p (in Hungarian).

Moser, B., Jaeger, J.A.G., Tappeiner, U., Tasser E., Eiselt, B. 2007. Modification of the effective mesh size for measuring landscape fragmentation to solve the boundary problem. Landscape Ecology 22 (3), 447-459.

Mucsi, L., Kovács, F., Henits, L., Tobak, Z., van Leeuwen, B., Szatmári, J., Mészáros, M. 2007. Városi területhasználat és felszínborítás vizsgálata távérzékeléses módszerekkel (Use of remote sensing systems for urban landuse and lancover analyses). In: Mezősi G. (ed.) Városökológia. Földrajzi Tanulmányok 1. JATEPress, 19-42 (in Hungarian).

Reck, H., Kaule, G. 1993. Strassen und Lebensraume: Ermittlung und Beurteilung strassenbedingter Auswirkungen auf Pflanzen, Tiere und ihre Lebensraume. Forschung Strassenbau und Stassenverkehrstechnik, Heft 654. Bonn-Bad Godesberg, Germany, 230 p.

Riitters, K.H., O'Neill, R.V., Hunsaker, C.T., Wickham, J.D., Yankee, D.H., Timmins, S.P., Jones, K.B., Jackson, B.L. 1995. A factor analysis of landscape pattern and structure metrics. Landscape Ecology 10, 23-29.

Spellerberg, I.F. 2002. Ecological effects of roads. Science Publishers, Ehnfield, New Hampshire, 251 p.10.1201/9781482279931

Szilassi, P., Bata, T. 2012. Tájak természetességének értékelése tájmetriai módszerekkel Magyarország példáján (Evaluation of naturalness using landscape metric methods in Hungarian landscapes). In: Farsang, A., Mucsi, L., Kevei-Bárány, I. (ed.) Táj - érték, lépték, változás Geo- Litera, Szeged, 75-84 (in Hungarian).

Saunders, D.A., Hobbs, R.J., Margules, C.R. 1991. Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation: a review. Conservation Biology 5, 18-32.

Tóth, G. 2006. Tervezett autópálya-építések tájvédelmi vonatkozásai (Landscape protection aspects of the planned motorway constructions). In: Csorba, P., Fazekas, I. (ed.) Tájkutatás. Tájökológia Dialóg Campus, Pécs (in Hungarian).

Trombulak, S.C., Frissell, C.A. 2000. Review of ecological effects of roads on terrestrial and aquatic communities. Conservation Biology 14, 18-30.

van Andel, J., Aronson, J. 2006. Restoration ecology. Blackwell Publishing, Malden, Oxford, Victoria

Wascher, D., Jongman, R. (ed.) 2000. European Landscapes, Classification, assessment and conservation, European Environment Agency, Coppenhagen, 99 p.

http://www.nif.hu/hu/fejlesztesek/vasutvonalak/ (last available: 2013.02. 04) (in Hungarian)

OTAB 1990. Hungarian Geoinformatical Database: http://epa.oszk.hu/02100/02154/00003/pdf/EPA02154_RSGIS_2012_01_14-38.pdf 28. p. (last available: 2013.02. 04) (in Hungarian)

Térkép Ltd. 2011. http://www.hiszimap.hu/index.php/terinformatika/ (last available: 2013.02. 04) (in Hungarian)

/2011. (VI.29.) Governmental Regulation. http://jogszabalykereso.mhk.hu/cgi_bin/njt_doc.cgi?docid=138610.342073 (last available: 2013.02. 04) (in Hungarian).