Quantifying the geodiversity of a study area in the Great Hungarian Plain
Main Article Content
Abstract
Geodiversity is understood as the diversity of the abiotic nature. It expresses the variety of stones, minerals, fossils, places, landforms, processes, soils and elements of hydrology. As geodiversity assessment is a rather new research area, the number of publications concerning geodiversity is growing fast. In this paper we quantified the geodiversity of a study area located at the Danube-Tisza Interfluve in the Great Hungarian Plain using the method worked out by Hjort and Luoto (2010). We wanted to know how the diversity varies in space at low-land areas applying different indexes. Geodiversity was represented by three different indexes. Total geodiversity was calculated by summariz-ing the geologic features, the landforms and the elements of hydrology found in each unit. Then we grouped the landforms by the (exogenic) processes which formed them, and the number of these processes gave the value of the geomorphologic process diversity. Finally we calculat-ed the geodiversity index by Serrano-Canadas and Ruiz-Flano (2007). The absolutely homogenous units (totally waterlogged areas and the flat sand sheets) have the lowest geodiversity. It is higher at the border of the sandy, peaty and waterlogged areas. At this lowland area there is no relationship between the geodiversity and the relief. This is the first work applying this method in Hungary, so the results are yet not com-parable.
Downloads
Article Details
x
References
Gray M. 2004. Geodiversity. Valuing and conserving abiotic nature. Chichester: John Wiley & Son. 434 p
Hjort J. – Luoto M. 2010. Geodiversity of high-latitude landscapes in Northern Finland. Geomorphology 115/1-2: 109-116
Jarvis A. J. 2005. Terrain controls on the distribution of tree species diversity and structure in tropical lowland and montane forest. London: King’s College.
Juhász Á. 2000. Kiskőrös természeti-ökológiai adottságai. Budapest: MTA Földrajztudományi Kutatóintézet
Keveiné Bárány I. 2007. Geodiverzitás a karsztokon. In: Veress M. (ed.) Karsztfejlődés XII. Szombathely: BDF Természetföldrajzi Tanszék. 215-223
Keveiné Bárány I. 2008. Geodiverzitás és tájdiverzitás. Földrajzi Közlemények 132: 431-439
Kozlowski S. 2004. Geodiversity: The concept and scope of Geodiversity. Przeglad Geologiczny 52/8/2: 833-837
Őrsi A. 2010. Geodiverzitás-vizsgálat egy nyugat-bükki mintaterületen. In: Kertész Á. (ed.) Tájökológiai Kutatások. Budapest: MTA Földrajztudományi Kutatóintézet. 201-207
Panizza M. 2009. The geomorphodiversity of the Dolomites (Italy): A key of geoheritage assessment. Geoheritage 1: 33-42
Parks K. – Mulligan M. 2010. On the relationship between a resource based measure of geodiversity and broad scale biodiversity patterns. Biodiversity Conservation 19: 2751-2766
Ruban D. A. 2010. Quantification of geodiversity and its loss. Proceedings of the Geologists’ Assotiation 121. 326-333
Santucci V. L. 2005. Historical perspectives on Biodiversity and Geodiversity. The George Wright Forum 22/3: 29-34
Serrano Canadas E. – Ruiz-Flano P. 2007. Geodiversity: A theoretical and applied concept. Geographica Helvetia 62/3:2-8
Serrano Canadas E. – Ruiz-Flano P. – Arroyo P. 2009. Geodiversity assessment in a rural landscape: Tiermes-Caracena area (Soria). Mem. Descr. Carta Geol. d’It. 171-178
Szilárd J. 1955. Geomorfológiai megfigyelések Kiskőrös és Paks vidékén. Földrajzi Értesítő 4/3: 263-278