Risk-taking Factors in a Dynamic Approach

Authors

  • László Csorba Eszterházy Károly Catholic University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14232/analecta.2024.3.107-117

Keywords:

risk, risk taking, risk model

Abstract

The most common definition of risk is quantified by the probability of an adverse event occurring and the value of the adverse consequence. Theoretically, the decision to take a risk can also be based essentially on these two pieces of information. In addition, according to traditional risk-taking models, the perception of risk, the psychological characteristics of the decision-makers and their relevant experience are also important. In the case of mathematical-statistical-psychological models, little emphasis is placed on the fact that risk is in fact the inability to completely control the activity in question. The causes of this incompleteness are based on the shortcomings in the relevant capabilities of the economic agent. Economic agents have different capabilities, so they rarely face the same risks, even for almost identical activities. Just as the requirements and circumstances of the activity are constantly changing, so are the capabilities of the economic agent. Consequently, the size of the capability gap of an economic agent is also constantly changing. This should be taken into account in risk-taking decisions and their revision. The paper attempts to model this dynamic risk-taking mechanism and to show how different risk-taking strategies may be pursued by economic agents in certain baseline situations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdel-Khalik A. R. (2014) Prospect Theory predictions in the field: Risk seekers in settings of weak accounting controls; Journal of Accounting Literature, vol. 33. pp. 58-84.

Ansoff, H. I. (1957). ‘Strategies for diversification’. Harvard Business Review, 35, pp.113–24.

Ascher W. (2009) Bringing in the Future – Strategies for Farsightedness and Sustainability in Developing Countries; The University of Chicago Press, Chicago

Baird I. S. - Thomas H. (1985) Toward a Contingency Model of Strategic Risk Taking; The Acedemy of Management Review. Vol. 10. no. 2. pp. 230-243.

Byrnes J. P. Et Al.(1999) Gender Differences in Risk Taking: A Meta-Analysis; Psychological Bulletin, vol. 125. No. 3. pp. 367-383.

Campbell J. Y. - Viceira L. M. (2005) The term structure of the risk return trade-off; National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper no. 11119, Cambridge

Chen, W. - Jung, S. - Peng, X. - Zhang, I. X. (2022) Outside Opportunities, Managerial Risk Taking, and CEO Compensation. The Accounting Review 1 March 2022; 97 (2): 135–160. https://doi.org/10.2308/TAR-2018-0614

Czuczor Gergely - Fogarasi János (1862-1874) A magyar nyelv szótára; Magyar Tudományos Akadémia, Budapest

GYURKÓ ÁDÁM. (2023). Magyarország vendégforgalmának teljesítményértékelése területi és keresleti szempontból 2019 és 2022 között, különös tekintettel eger városának turisztikai teljesítőképességére. Turisztikai és Vidékfejlesztési Tanulmányok, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.15170/TVT.2022.07.04.02

GYURKÓ ÁDÁM et al. (2024) Characterisation of Hungary's regional tourism and economic performance between 2004 and 2022 in the light of EU funding; Geographica Pannonica, 28(1) pp. 28-33. http://www.dgt.uns.ac.rs/en/homepage/pannonica/

GYURKÓ ÁDÁM, & GONDA TIBOR (2024). A turizmusfejlesztés helyzet- és teljesítményértékelése a Pécs-Villány turisztikai térségben. Turizmus Bulletin, 24(2), 41–51. https://doi.org/10.14267/TURBULL.2024v24n2.5

Hunjra, A.I. - Hanif, M. - Mehmood, R. - Nguyen, L.V. (2021), "Diversification, corporate governance, regulation and bank risk-taking", Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, Vol. 19 No. 1, pp. 92-108. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-03-2020-0071

Keynes, J. M. (1921): The treatise on probability. London: Mac Millan

Knight, F. H. (1921) Risk, Uncertainty and Profit; University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign's Academy for Entrepreneurial Leadership Historical Research Reference in Entrepreneurship

MAIRAL, G. (2020) The Pre-Modern Cultural History of Risk - Imagining the Future; Routledge, London, https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429344404

MEDVEGYEV, PÉTER (2011) Néhány megjegyzés a kockázat, bizonytalanság, valószínűség kérdéséhez; Hitelintézeti Szemle, 10 (4). pp. 314-324.

Pisscino, L. (2016) Genoa, 1340–1620: Early Development of Marine Insurance; In: Leonard, A. B. (ed.) Marine Insurance Origins and Institutions, 1300–1850; pp. 25-46. Pelgrave, London

Rogers A. R. (1994) Evolution of Time Preference by Natural Selection; The American Economic Review, vol. 84. no. 3. pp. 460-481.

Semino, O. Et Al. (2000) The Genetic Legacy of Paleolithic Homo sapiens sapiens in Extant

Settembre-Blundo, D. - González-Sánchez, R. - Medina-Salgado, S. Et Al. (2021) Flexibility and Resilience in Corporate Decision Making: A New Sustainability-Based Risk Management System in Uncertain Times. Glob J Flex Syst Manag 22 (Suppl 2), 107–132 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-021-00277-7

Száz, János (2011) Valószínűség, esély, relatív súlyok. Opciók és reálopciók; Hitelintézeti Szemle, 11 (4). pp. 336-348.

Szlávik, János – Szép, Tekla (2023) A Framework of Risks in the Context of Industry 4.0, Related to Sustainability, World Futures, 79:3, 406-429, DOI: 10.1080/02604027.2021.2012875

Vlek C. - Stallen P. J. (1980) Rational and Personal Aspects of Risk; Acta Psychologica, vol. 45. pp. 273-300.

Downloads

Published

2024-10-28

How to Cite

Csorba, L. (2024). Risk-taking Factors in a Dynamic Approach . Analecta Technica Szegedinensia, 18(3), 107–117. https://doi.org/10.14232/analecta.2024.3.107-117

Issue

Section

Articles