Humanoid robotok biztonságtechnikája - Áttekintés

Main Article Content

Kóczi Dávid
Sárosi József

Absztrakt

A humanoid robotok, azaz az emberi formára tervezett és az emberi mozgást utánzó gépek erősödő terjedésével párhuzamosan kiemelten fontossá vált ezen eszközök biztonságtechnikája. Mivel a robotok az emberek közvetlen környezetében az ember által épített és az embernek szánt környezetben működhetnek, például gyárak vagy otthonok, elengedhetetlenek olyan technológiák és szabályok alkalmazása, amelyek megelőzik a baleseteket vagy csökkenthetik a bekövetkezett balesetek súlyosságát. Ez a cikk áttekinti a szakirodalom alapján a humanoid robotok biztonságtechnikáját öt kulcsterületen. Fizikai biztonság, szoftveres és kiberbiztonság, ipari és munkahelyi alkalmazások biztonsági előírásai, szabványok és jogszabályok, valamint etikai és társadalmi kérdések. Összességében a humanoid robotok biztonságtechnikájának fejlesztése alapvető fontosságú a modern ipari és háztartási környezetben, a hatékony és biztonságos ember-robot együttműködés kialakításához. Az áttekintés feltárta, hogy a fizikai biztonság többrétegű rendszeren alapul, amely ötvözi az aktív és passzív megoldásokat, mint a szenzor alapú ütközés elkerülés vagy erőkorlátozás puha védőburkolat segítségével. A kiberbiztonság terén kulcsfontosságú a hitelesítés és a kommunikáció titkosítása. Szabványok tekintetében inkább hiányosságok mutatkoznak, amely rámutatnak a humanoid robot specifikus előírások szükségességére. Etikai szempontból a felhasználói bizalom elnyerése és a magánszféra védelme kulcsfontosságú.

Letöltések

Letölthető adat még nem áll rendelkezésre.

Article Details

Hogyan kell idézni
Kóczi, Dávid, és Sárosi József. 2025. „Humanoid Robotok biztonságtechnikája - Áttekintés”. Jelenkori Társadalmi és Gazdasági Folyamatok 20 (3):95-109. https://doi.org/10.14232/jtgf.2025.3.95-109.
Folyóirat szám
Rovat
Műszaki innovációk és ipari technológiák

Hivatkozások

Atkeson, C. G., Babu, B. P. W., Banerjee, N., Berenson, D., Bove, C. P., Cui, X., DeDonato, M., Du, R., Feng, S.,Franklin, P., Gennert, M., Graff, J. P., He, P., Jaeger, A., Kim, J., Knoedler, K., Li, L., Liu, C., Long, X., Padir, T., Polido, F., Tighe, G. G., Xinjilefu, X. (2015): No falls, no resets: Reliable humanoid behavior in the DARPA robotics challenge. In: 2015 IEEE-RAS 15th International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids). IEEE, Szöul, Dél-Korea. 623–630. https://doi.org/10.1109/HUMANOIDS.2015.7363436

A3 Robotics | Association for Advancing Automation (2025): Automate. <https://www.automate.org/robotics> (2025.03.10.)

Az Európai Parlament és a Tanács 2006/42/EK irányelve (2006. május 17.) a gépekről és egyes irányelvek módosításáról.

Botta, A., Rotbei, S., Zinno, S., Ventre, G. (2023): Cyber security of robots: A comprehensive survey. Intelligent Systems with Applications, 18: 200237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswa.2023.200237

Cao, X., Wu, Y., Nielsen, M., Wang, F. (2025): Does appearance affect children’s selective trust in robots’ social and emotional testimony? Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 96, 101739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2024.101739

Chatzimichali, A., Harrison, R., Chrysostomou, D. (2021): Toward privacy-sensitive human–robot interaction: Privacy terms and human–data interaction in the personal robot era. Paladyn, Journal of Behavioral Robotics, 12 (1): 160–174. https://doi.org/10.1515/pjbr-2021-0013

Cui, C., Park, C., Park, S. (2023): Physical Length and Weight Reduction of Humanoid In-Robot Network with Zonal Architecture. Sensors, 23 (5): 2627. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23052627

Dario, P., Laschi, C., & Guglielmelli, E. (1996): Sensors and actuators for ‘humanoid’ robots. Advanced Robotics, 11 (6): 567–584. https://doi.org/10.1163/156855397X00083

EU AI Act: First regulation on artificial intelligence (2023): <https://www.europarl.europa.eu/topics/en/article/20230601STO93804/eu-ai-act-first-regulation-on-artificial-intelligence> (2025.03.20.)

European Parliament. Directorate General for Parliamentary Research Services. (2020): The ethics of artificial intelligence: Issues and initiatives. Publications Office, Luxembourg. <https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2861/6644> (2025.03.20.)

Fallón, M. F., Antone, M., Roy, N., & Teller, S. (2014): Drift-free humanoid state estimation fusing kinematic, inertial and LIDAR sensing. In: 2014 IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots. IEEE, Madrid, Spanyolország. 112–119. https://doi.org/10.1109/HUMANOIDS.2014.7041346

Flacco, F., Kröger, T., De Luca, A., Khatib, O. (2012): A depth space approach to human-robot collision avoidance. In: 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 338–345. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA.2012.6225245

Gosselin, R., Vieu, L., Loukil, F., Benoit, A. (2022): Privacy and Security in Federated Learning: A Survey. Applied Sciences, 12 (19): 9901. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12199901

Guiochet, J., Machin, M., Waeselynck, H. (2017): Safety-critical advanced robots: A survey. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 94: 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2017.04.004

Haney, J. M., Liang, C.-J. (2024): A literature review on safety perception and trust during human-robot interaction with autonomous mobile robots that apply to industrial environments. IISE Transactions on Occupational Ergonomics and Human Factors, 12 (1–2): 6–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/24725838.2023.2283537

IEC 61508:2010: Functional safety of electrical/electronic/programmable electronic safety-related systems.

ISA/IEC 62443 Series of Standards: Security for industrial automation and control systems.

ISO/TS 15066:2016: Robots and robotic devices – Collaborative robots.

ISO 10218-1:2025: Safety of machinery – General principles for design – Risk assessment and risk reduction.

ISO 10218-2:2025: Robotics – Safety requirementsPart 2: Industrial robot applications and robot cells.

ISO 12100:2010: Safety of machinery – General principles for design – Risk assessment and risk reduction.

Kaonain, T. E., Abdul Rahman, M. A., Mohammed Ariff, M. H., Mondal, K. (2020): A simulated risk assessment of human-robot interaction in the domestic environment. IAES International Journal of Robotics and Automation (IJRA), 9 (4): 300. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijra.v9i4.pp300-310

Kirca, Y. S., Degirmenci, E., Demirci, Z., Yazici, A., Ozkan, M., Ergun, S., Kanak, A. (2023): Runtime Verification for Anomaly Detection of Robotic Systems Security. Machines, 11 (2): Article 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/machines11020166

Kuffner, J.,Nischiwaki, K., Kagami, S., Inaba, M., Inoue, H. (2005): Motion Planning for Humanoid Robots. Robotics Research. The Eleventh International Symposium. Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics, vol 15. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. 365-374. https://doi.org/10.1007/11008941_39

Li, Y. F., Chen, X. B. (1998): On the dynamic behavior of a force/torque sensor for robots. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 47 (1): 304–308. https://doi.org/10.1109/19.728839

Ling, J., Li, X., Shen, L., Chen, C., Yan, Z., Zhu, H., Li, H. (2025): Human centric VR system development supporting fire emergency evacuation: A novel knowledge-data dual driven approach. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 63: 102693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2024.102693

Mori, M., MacDorman, K. F., Kageki, N. (2012): The Uncanny Valley [From the Field]. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 19 (2): 98–100. https://doi.org/10.1109/MRA.2012.2192811

Munir, S., Khan, K., Aslam, N., Abid, M., Rehman, M. (2023): Humanoid Robots: Cybersecurity Concerns And Firewall Implementation. VFAST Transactions on Software Engineering, 11: 85–100. https://doi.org/10.21015/vtcs.v11i1.1454

Nascimento, H., Mujica, M., Benoussaad, M. (2020): Collision Avoidance in Human-Robot Interaction Using Kinect Vision System Combined With Robot’s Model and Data. In: 2020 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEE, Las Vegas, NV, USA. 10293–10298. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS45743.2020.9341248

Ogorodnikova, O. (2007): Robot introduction in Human work environment. Developments, Challenges and Solutions. In: 2007 IEEE International Conference on Computational Cybernetics. IEEE, Gödöllő, Magyarország. 167–172. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCCYB.2007.4402029

Osawa, Y., Kinbara, Y., Kageoka, M., Iida, K., Kheddar, A. (2021): Soft robotic shell with active thermal display. Scientific Reports, 11 (1): 20070. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-99117-y

Park, C.-Y., Lee, S.-J., Lee, I.-G. (2025): Secure and Lightweight Firmware Over-the-Air Update Mechanism for Internet of Things. Electronics, 14 (8): Article 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14081583

Prashant, Md Sohail Haque, Amrinder Kaur, Pankaj Yadav. (2024): Comparative Analysis of AES and RSA with Other Encryption Techniques for Secure Communication. International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 10 (2): 565–574. https://doi.org/10.32628/CSEIT2410263

Ramuzat, N., Buondonno, G., Boria, S., Stasse, O. (2021): Comparison of Position and Torque Whole-Body Control Schemes on the Humanoid Robot TALOS. In: 2021 20th International Conference on Advanced Robotics (ICAR). IEEE, Ljubljana, Szlovénia. 785–792. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAR53236.2021.9659380

Shaffer, D., Lorson, P., Plunkett, Z., Ragai, I., Danesh-Yazdi, A., Ashour, O. (2018): Development of Experiment-Based Mathematical Models of Acoustic Signals for Machine Condition Monitoring. Procedia CIRP, 72: 1316–1320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.03.269

Simion, G., Filipescu, A., Ionescu, D., Filipescu, A. (2025): Cloud/VPN-Based Remote Control of a Modular Production System Assisted by a Mobile Cyber–Physical Robotic System – Digital Twin Approach. Sensors, 25 (2): Article 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25020591

Sugiura, H., Gienger, M., Janssen, H., Goerick, C. (2007): Real-time collision avoidance with whole body motion control for humanoid robots. In: 2007 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. IEEE, San Diego, CA, USA. 2053–2058. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2007.4399062

Sun, Y., Liu, Y., Zou, T., Jin, M., Liu, H. (2015): Design and optimization of a novel six-axis force/torque sensor for space robot. Measurement, 65: 135–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2015.01.005

Tanimu, J. A., Abada, W. (2025a): Addressing cybersecurity challenges in robotics: A comprehensive overview. Cyber Security and Applications, 3: 100074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csa.2024.100074

Tonietti, G., Schiavi, R., Bicchi, A. (2005): Design and Control of a Variable Stiffness Actuator for Safe and Fast Physical Human/Robot Interaction. In: Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. IEEE, Barcelona, Spanyolország. 526–531. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROBOT.2005.1570172

Vallery, H., Veneman, J., van Asseldonk, E., Ekkelenkamp, R., Buss, M., van Der Kooij, H. (2008): Compliant actuation of rehabilitation robots. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 15( 3): 60–69. https://doi.org/10.1109/MRA.2008.927689

Valori, M., Scibilia, A., Fassi, I., Saenz, J., Behrens, R., Herbster, S., Bidard, C., Lucet, E., Magisson, A., Schaake, L., Bessler, J., Prange-Lasonder, G. B., Kühnrich, M., Lassen, A. B., Nielsen, K. (2021): Validating Safety in Human–Robot Collaboration: Standards and New Perspectives. Robotics, 10 (2): Article 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/robotics10020065

Virk, G. S., Moon, S., Gelin, R. (2008): ISO Standards for Sercvice Robots. In: Advances in Mobile Robotics, 133–138. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812835772_0016

Yaacoub, J.-P. A., Noura, H. N., Salman, O., Chehab, A. (2022): Robotics cyber security: Vulnerabilities, attacks, countermeasures, and recommendations. International Journal of Information Security, 21 (1): 115–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10207-021-00545-8

Yang, S., Guo, J., Rui, X. (2024): Formal Analysis and Detection for ROS2 Communication Security Vulnerability. Electronics, 13 (9): Article 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13091762

Yfantis, E., Fayed, A. (2014): Authentication and Secure Robot Communication. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, 11: 1. https://doi.org/10.5772/57433

Zafir, E. I., Akter, A., Islam, M. N., Hasib, S. A., Islam, T., Sarker, S. K., Muyeen, S. M. (2024): Enhancing security of Internet of Robotic Things: A review of recent trends, practices, and recommendations with encryption and blockchain techniques. Internet of Things, 28: 101357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iot.2024.101357

Zanchettin, A. M., Ceriani, N. M., Rocco, P., Ding, H., Matthias, B. (2016): Safety in human-robot collaborative manufacturing environments: Metrics and control. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 13 (2): 882–893. https://doi.org/10.1109/TASE.2015.2412256

Zeestraten, M. J. A., Pereira, A., Althoff, M., Calinon, S. (2016): Online motion synthesis with minimal intervention control and formal safety guarantees. In: 2016 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC). IEEE, Budapest, Magyarország. 002116–002121. https://doi.org/10.1109/SMC.2016.7844552

Zhang, Q., Zhang, Z., Cui, W., Sun, J., Cao, J., Guo, Y., Han, G., Zhao, W., Wang, J., Sun, C., Zhang, L., Cheng, H., Chen, Y., Wang, L., Tang, J., Xu, R. (2025): HumanoidPano: Hybrid Spherical Panoramic-LiDAR Cross-Modal Perception for Humanoid Robots (No. arXiv:2503.09010). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2503.09010

Zhao, S. (2006): Humanoid social robots as a medium of communication. New Media & Society, 8 (3): 401–419. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444806061951